Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chuckt But they did NOT remove the particle board underlayment that sits on top of the 3/4" ply subfloor...they had nicked a baseboard hot water heating pipe in the front hallway which of course flooded the area... with the new flooring in the front hall, the front door would barely open...In any case, because it was just before the holidays we signed off on the job and made out final payment figuring we'd just have to live with it. |
Okay, Chuck, if I may be so bold, the mistake scoreboard now stands at them:3, you:1. The game's not over yet, apparently, but you don't want to make any more mistakes, as in letting those clowns anywhere near your neighborhood, much less your house.
I'm no lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but I have installed hardwood floors and laminate of several different types - successfully, I might add. In fact, my feet are resting comfortably on varnished maple as I type these words.
First, particle board sucks as an underlayment. If there is any good use of PB, floors are not it. When, not if, it absorbs moisture, it swells up like crazy and then disintegrates into the sawdust from whence it came. Any professional floor layer will take precautions against this problem, usually removing it and resheeting with thinner material (1/4" ACX plywood is common here). Had your clowns done that, problem # 3, the door not closing, wouldn't have happened.
Second, it sounds like they were removing the parquet when they busted the pipe, which flooded the area. Then they finished installing the next day: big mistake! At that point, the moisture content of the flooded area had to be somewhere in the 30-50% range, and flooring over it trapped all that moisture under there, which is why you're seeing cupping now - the underside of each flooring board is expanding while the top side is still tight.
If the hardwood was installed anywhere close to correctly, it won't be reuseable when you take it up. There are two distinct installation methods for plank flooring, floating and blind-nailed. A floating floor is needed when, for example, you install a radiant heating system and 1) you can't nail into the cement or gypcrete that the tubes/coils/piping are imbedded in, and 2) the heat and cooling is going to expand and contract the flooring. In this case, a thin foam liner is laid down and the edges of each plank are glued in the tongue and groove. If it's done right, the glue joint is as strong or stronger than the wood itself, and when you tear it out, you end up with kindling. Unless you sawcut it into sections for removal, but reinstallation requires milling new tongues and grooves in your sawcut edges, and you lose about 1/2" per section, so you have to have extra planks to fill the gap...
You description sounds more like blind nailing was their method, in which each tongue is nailed every couple feet and then the groove of the next plank is fitted over it, banged up tight, and that tongue nailed, etc. When you dismantle this, you'll split off at least every other tongue. Reinstallation requires ripping the remnants of the tongues off, and remilling new tongues, which means you lose more than 1/2" per plank, so you have to have extra planks to fill the gap...
(summary of last 2 paragraphs: chances are about 10 to 1 you won't be able to reuse much if any of that flooring).
A few more questions, if you don't mind:
Did they deliver the flooring about a week early and pull the wrappers? This would allow the hardwood to acclimate itself to the temp and humidity conditions in the house. If not, that accounts for the 1/32" gaps (you're lucky they're that small), because the planks were stored in a cooler/more humid place and shrunk after being banged up tight.
Did they use a moisture meter to test both the flooring and the subsurface before starting installation, and use supplemental heat and airflow if needed? I like to get down to about 6%, but I've done it at 8 and been okay. Much above that and you start to risk noticeable shrinkage.
Did the installers have a van or box truck with their business name on it (not the floor shop name)? You might be in a better legal position if they were employees of the floor shop than subcontractors. The fact that the floor rep agreed to pay for the plumbing repair makes me think they work directly for him. If that's the case, you can avoid a lot of useless finger-pointing.
I think you need a competent pro on your side, both as an expert witness if needed, and as a problem-solving consultant. Here's what I would do - ask around and find the best independent floor layer you can find. Offer him 50 or 100 bucks to come over and take a look at what you've got. Ask him to meter the floor and any part of the subfloor you can get to. If the moisture problem can be solved, ask him if there's any chance of sanding and refinishing the floor in place, and filling the cracks at the same time. Ask him if his finisher could do that, or who he could recommend.
Refinishing a floor is something you might could do yourself, but only as a last resort. It's brutal hard work and the chemicals are nasssssty. DAMHIKT. The floor store owes you a fix, so try that avenue first, but don't trust anyone associated with them as far as you can throw them. That last guy was full of sh...aving cream.
HTH and good luck,
Parker
p.s. 5 bucks/sf is a dirt cheap installed price for pre-fin hardwood flooring, so I think they were slamming it out to make any profit at all. My last job (raw oak) cost the homeowner closer to 13-14, came out breathtakingly beautiful, and is the focal point of the whole house.