In another thread in this forum
Competition....Should I or Shouldn't I?, Kenny_S says "Not that the competition dictates what a carver must carve to win but what judges dictates. Copying others works? We all copy others to a point. How many cowboys have been carved in the last 10 years, How many Santas have been carved, how many birds? We all copy something. I would like to carve like you and may try something you have shown us on you Blog. If I do carve anny carving from your blog, it is a copy. Would I display it, Yep, would I enter competition, no!
It would be mine carving but copied."
Bill, in the same thread says "By the way, my "Campfire Cook" took a third in the open division, but I have two more upcoming shows in the coming months, and I'm going into them with the feeling that the cook is good enough to take a 1st, but then again, its in the judges hands at that point."
I'd like to see the opinion of others on the subject of what carvings you would enter into a copetition and which you wouldn't and why. It appears that Kenny_S would not enter the campfire cook, if he decided to carve, and yet Bill has already won a ribbon for the "same" carving. I respect both opinions, as each should only enter what he/she wants to. The way I look at it is that a carving I start from a block of wood, using a photograph of a subject as a pattern, is no different than using a photograph off Lynn's web site, or Irish's web site, or anyone elses. The carving is 100% done by me, and therefore i can enter it in a competition. Caveats: I do give credit for the pattern (or photograph). Of course, if part of the judging is on "originality", then I guess I wouldn't get a very hight award, if any. But that's ok, too. I'd still get a chance to see how my work compares to others.
So, what is your opinion about what carvings you would enter, and what carvings you wouldn't?
Claude