I can see your point, Lynn. Why do people try so hard to classify their work or identify with carving legends???
I absolutely LOVE the folk-art look of flat-plane carving. I really got interested in it when I started researching Wilhelm Schimmel, a "Tramp-carver" who moved around in my part of the country. His pieces now sell for tens of thousands of dollars...and they look very simplistic...but take a lot more work than they look.
Jonathan Bastion, the guy who taught me to carve in that style, can finish a tiger in literally 45 minutes and it looks awsome...I'm still working on the roughout he gave me nearly 2 years ago!
Seeing Harley Refsal's work or Woodbutcher Jan's work...they make a few strategic cuts...and they are done...it's amazing to me. They can whip out carvings with character, feeling, emotion...faster than i can cut something out on a bandsaw. From brain to wood...that quick...I envy them!
I can see your point, Lynn, about how some carving in that style look unfinished. But I don't think a properly done one...something like what Harley Refsal's carvings...looks unfinished. I guess for me, it's like what Chris Pye says...a sanded carving doesn't pick up the light they way one "left to the chisel" does. Sharp angles are not bad, but rounding some parts off is not bad either! Look at Harley's pieces at this link
http://www.pinewoodforge.com/NEW-VERSIONS.html
They show life, movement, chacter, and are a bit rounded off...I love them!!! The strategic cuts...while they look random, convey just the right feeling of movement to make these carvings come alive.
Some of the other masters, Janel, Trygg, even Harold Enlow...capture that sense of movement in just a few cuts...cuts they've made SO many times in the past that they don't even think about why they make a cut there...they just do...that, to me, is amazing!!!
Bob